S. Korean Voice Concerns Over Google Earth
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e45f9/e45f966e1228602ad8a0f588a0a2cabaa0f339df" alt=""
Last week I posted about legislators in The Netherlands raising similar concerns.
More on the mapping mistake that seems to have the Aussies up in arms:
Forestry Tasmania has extended a habitat for threatened parrots, to increase protection of the birds, after part of their habitat was mistakenly logged.
The company felled 17 trees in the reserve for swift parrots, next to its logging coupe in the Weilangta State Forest.
Forestry Tasmania general manager Kim Creek says the error was caused by incorrect boundary markings on a map.
He says the error has not damaged the habitat...
Greens Senator Bob Brown says Forestry Tasmania has broken its own rules, and is calling for management to pay with their jobs.
The controversy illustrates that no matter how technologically advanced and automated mapping becomes, there will always be a need for human oversight and common sense. While the article doesn't spell out exactly what the mistake was, it may have been something as simple as using a solid line where a dashed line should have been. Legends, notes, clearly defined abbreviations, the "nuts and bolts" of mapmaking, though sometimes overlooked, will always be important
The company says a mapping error was to blame.
Greens Senator Bob Brown says it is a shameful piece of illegal logging and claims the error has further eroded the habitat of the rare and endangered swift parrot.
This issue highlights one of the little known facts of property law. A property owner may not own or have absolute right to the rivers and creeks that flow through his property. When this country was settled, streams and rivers were seen as avenues of commerce. In many instances, some rights, to either the water or navigation, were retained by the government, in trust for the people.
Complete Article From Denver Post
The Trans-Texas Corridor is visualized as a network of roads, railway and utility infrastructure criss-crossing the state. The system of roads is designed to accommodate growing trade and traffic on the state's interstate system. TxDot has been negotiating a deal with Cintra-Zachry for the company to build the corridor at its own expense in exchange for a 50-year lease to operate the corridor as a tollway. In addition to tolls, the original plan would allow Cintra-Zachry to develop and build restaurants, hotels, gas stations, and convenience stores along the corridor's route. Nothing in the bill prohibits the developer from building such facilities. However, under the new law, the state could not use it's eminent domain powers to cease private land for Cintra-Zachry to construct such facilities. The only way eminent domain powers could be used for such private enterprises would be with approval of the County Commissioner's Court that they would be located in.
The Trans-Texas Corridor has been a hotly debated topic, especially in central Texas. Opponents contend the system of roads and ancillary facilities is not economically feasible and would unnecessarily harm the environment. So contentious is the issue that last week when rumors surfaced that TxDOT had surveyors out mapping the proposed route the state agency was forced to issued a statement denying it.
We're all familiar with mapping streets, utilities, property, topographic features, and zoning categories . But mapmakers in England are taking on the task of mapping a different feature: Noise. Cartographers are charting decibel levels along major roads in 20 English towns and cities as part of the Government program to tackle noise pollution.
Local Environmental Quality Minister, Ben Bradshaw explains, "By creating noise maps we can get a better understanding of the overall situation and target our efforts to tackle unwanted noise where it is really needed. By creating more of these maps we can help Government, local authorities, planners and the public better understand noise levels and work more efficiently to reduce the number of people who are exposed to high levels of noise.
The eminent domain bill comes far too late for some residents of Hurst, Texas. Back in 1995, the city used its power of eminent domain to condemn their homes to make way for an expansion of Northeast Mall. The property seizure took place long before the use of governmental power to benefit private property owners had become such a hot issue. In one instance, a woman dying of cancer was forced from her home, which was needed for a parking lot for the new Nordstoms. However, CNN is reportedly planning to revisit the day Hurst city leaders evicted their citizen's from their own homes. According to the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, the cable news channel is planning a story on the issue.
Senate Bill 7, a bill that would limit the government's ability to take property from private owners through eminent domain has been passed by the
The bill restricts local governments from using their eminent domain powers to take privately owned property so they can turn it over to retail, industrial or residential developers. It was passed in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s controversial Kelo v. New London decision which greatly expanded government’s power to take private property.
While the article depicts the process of one where the city provided incentives for the development, it doesn't sound that way to me. This is an example of a city zoning property so restrictively that no economically feasible use can be made of the property. In order to develop the land, the property owner must accede to city demands for “open space”. Yet consider for a moment what would happen if the entire city were developed according to these "smart growth" regulations. Grocery stores, restaurants, medical offices, specialty shops, all look for one thing in deciding where to locate: rooftops. Such restrictive uses, spread across a large span of the city, would result in a community with such a low population density that it would be difficult for any of the city services most people take for granted, to locate anywhere near these types of neighborhoods.
A couple years ago, Russ Weatherbee, a wildlife biologist with the National Park Service was cleaning out a cabinet of old maps when he stumbled across one from the 1960s marked with a note reading "Whiskeytown falls" near
His curiosity aroused, he turned to global imaging system maps on his computer where he saw a stretch in the creek that dropped in altitude quickly with a sliver of white leading through it. The combination of old and new maps led park officials to the nearly 400-foot waterfall in a remote corner of the Whiskeytown National Recreation Area, in northern
The California case below illustrates how you can lose the exclusive use of your land through a prescriptive easement. In a similar manner you can actually lose ownership of some or all of your land through adverse possesion. Adverse possession is where a person can acquire title to land through occupying it for a time period proscribed by state law. Generally this means fencing it off and using it as your own.
However, a recent situation in Kentucky is a good reminder that there is one land owner adverse possession does not run against; the government.
The Army has informed several landowners abutting Fort Knox that 83 acres of government land was mistakenly included in their subdivision back in the 1970s. Now the Army wants its land back.
A Pentagon spokeswoman says the Army might decide to compensate occupants of the land, but so far no decision has been made. It's also not even clear that the Army can use tax dollars to pay for land it already owns.
Recreationists claim that they’ve been using a dirt road across private property to access public lands on
Monica Kohs, who bought the back in December for $1.3 million, recently put up “No trespassing” signs seeking to deny the public access to the road.
However, it may be that the public has acquired the right to continue using the road through the doctrine of a prescriptive easement. Under California Law, a Prescriptive Easement is established by "obvious, open, notorious and continuous use for more than five years," according to court papers for a